Placeholder Project One
Cut a manual process by >70% — replace with your real headline number
One or two sentences describing what this project is and who it was for. This appears on the cards.
- Tech One
- Tech Two
- Tech Three
- Tech Four
Problem
What was broken or expensive before this existed? Be concrete: who was affected, how long it took, what it cost. A reader should feel the pain here.
Replace this with two or three sentences of real context.
Approach
How you solved it, and — more importantly — why you chose that approach over the alternatives. This is the section that demonstrates engineering judgement, so it is worth the most attention.
- The key architectural decision and its trade-off
- Something you deliberately chose not to do, and why
- How you verified it actually worked
Tip: add a diagram here. An architecture sketch communicates more in three seconds than three paragraphs. Put images in
public/images/projects/and reference them as.
Result
The outcome, with numbers where you have them: latency, cost, time saved, error rate, adoption. If you cannot share exact figures, use relative ones (“roughly a third faster”) rather than dropping the section.
What I’d do differently
Optional, but this section is disproportionately persuasive. Naming a genuine limitation signals confidence and self-awareness far more than a flawless write-up does.